Wednesday round-up

Here’s a round-up of Supreme Court-related news and commentary from around the web:

• Barrett was trustee at private school with anti-gay policies (Michelle Smith & Michael Biesecker, Associated Press)
• Supreme Court split in Pa. election case raises questions about how a Justice Barrett would rule (Seung Min Kim & Robert Barnes, The Washington Post)
• Supreme Court’s Pennsylvania mail ballot ruling tees up test for Barrett (John Kruzel, The Hill)
• Poll: Majority says Senate should confirm Amy Coney Barrett (Steven Shepard, Politico)
• Unequal Justice: Confirmation Hearings Exposed Barrett as a Hardcore Rightwing Activist (Bill Blum, The Progressive)
• Editorial: Barrett’s moral relativism is cause for rejection from the bench (Editorial staff, National Catholic Reporter)
• Is the Fifth Circuit En Banc Opinion a Bad Call or Have the Treasury and FHFA Perpetrated a Fraud on the Court in Collins v. Mnuchin? (Joseph Marren, Jurist)

We rely on our readers to send us links for our round-up. If you have or know of a recent (published in the last two or three days) article, post, podcast or op-ed relating to the Supreme Court that youd like us to consider for inclusion, please send it to [email protected]. Thank you!