Skip to content
Newsletter

SCOTUStoday for Tuesday, March 17

Carved details along top of Supreme Court building are pictured
(Katie Barlow)

Happy St. Patrick’s Day! We recommend celebrating by reading about Supreme Court justices of Irish descent.

At the Court

On Monday, the Supreme Court announced that it will hear oral argument in April on whether the Trump administration can end a program that allows several thousand Syrians and approximately 350,000 Haitians to live in the United States temporarily. For more on the disputes, see Amy’s coverage in the On Site section below.

Hours earlier, Haitian nationals urged the Supreme Court to deny the Trump administration’s request to be allowed to remove their protected immigration status.

Also on Monday, the Supreme Court denied a request for a stay of execution from Michael L. King, who is scheduled to be executed in Florida today.

A dispute over a land transfer and mining project involving a Native American sacred site in Arizona has returned to the Supreme Court, this time on its interim docket.

The court has indicated that it may announce opinions on Friday at 10 a.m. EDT. We will be live blogging that morning beginning at 9:30.

The court will next hear arguments on Monday, the first day of its March sitting.

Morning Reads

Trump Slams Supreme Court, Says It ‘Ransacked’ America

Khaleda Rahman, Newsweek

In a Truth Social post on Sunday, President Donald Trump revisited the Supreme Court’s tariffs ruling and continued to criticize the justices who ruled against him. “This completely inept and embarrassing Court was not what the Supreme Court of the United States was set up by our wonderful Founders to be. They are hurting our Country, and will continue to do so,” the president wrote. He continued, “Our Country was unnecessarily RANSACKED by the United States Supreme Court, which has become little more than a weaponized and unjust Political Organization.”

Apache tribe members urge Supreme Court to protect sacred land from U.S. mine deal

Stephen Dinan, The Washington Times

Members of a Western Apache tribe have asked the court on its interim docket “to block a proposed land transfer to a mining company, saying it would destroy a sacred tribal place in Arizona” called Oak Flat or Chi’chil Bildagoteel, according to The Washington Times. “Apache members say the administration is breaking the law at every turn, violating the religious rights of the tribe, breaking environmental rules by not considering alternative mining practices, and trampling on historic preservation law.” The Supreme Court has declined to intervene in the dispute twice before, and “Justice Neil M. Gorsuch said both times that the court should have taken the case.”

Resolution Copper to start drilling at Oak Flat after court decision

Debra Utacia Krol, Arizona Republic

On Monday, Resolution Copper, the company planning to mine the Oak Flat area, filed a response to the Western Apache tribe members’ emergency application to the Supreme Court, explaining that “it would begin exploratory drilling in the Oak Flat area” and that “the land exchange occurred shortly after” the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit ruled in its favor, according to the Arizona Republic. Resolution Copper’s filing noted “that initial work will utilize only existing roads and drill pads, so it will not produce any new surface disturbance or affect applicants’ access to Oak Flat.”

Appeals court allows Trump to swiftly deport migrants to third countries

Zach Schonfeld, The Hill

A divided panel for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit “ruled Monday that the Trump administration may keep swiftly deporting migrants to countries where they have no ties as a legal challenge unfolds,” lifting “limits on the policy imposed by U.S. District Judge Brian Murphy,” according to The Hill. “Last year, the Trump administration went to the Supreme Court and won after Murphy limited third country removals at an earlier stage of the case. In his final ruling last month, Murphy said material differences had emerged and blocked the policy once again.”

The Court Ruling in the Fed Chair’s Favor Is a Double-Edged Sword

Nick Timiraos, The Wall Street Journal

In a column for The Wall Street Journal, Nick Timiraos reflected on the Federal Reserve’s growing dependence on court orders as the president “press[es] to exert direct control over interest-rate decisions in any way possible.” In the past, the Fed’s “independence from the White House rested on an unwritten set of norms”; now, Trump is ignoring those norms, leading to major legal battles, including the case over Fed Governor Lisa Cook’s firing that’s now in front of the Supreme Court. A Supreme Court “ruling upholding Cook’s removal protections would reinforce the legal walls around the Fed. A ruling against her could give any president a direct lever over monetary policy that none has previously had,” Timiraos wrote.

On Site

Interim Docket

Justices will hear argument on Trump administration’s removal of protected status for Syrian and Haitian nationals

In a brief, unsigned order, the justices on Monday left in place rulings by federal judges in New York and Washington, D.C., that had indefinitely postponed the termination of the Temporary Protected Status program for Syrian and Haitian nationals. But the justices granted a pair of requests from the Trump administration to weigh in on the merits of the dispute over the administration’s efforts to end the TPS program for those nationals without waiting for federal appeals courts to do so first, as is the normal procedure.

Photo taken on Feb. 25, 2022 shows the U.S. Supreme Court building in Washington, D.C.,
Interim Docket

Haitian nationals ask court to deny Trump administration’s request to remove their protected status

Before the court released its Monday order, a group of Haitian nationals urged the Supreme Court on Monday to leave in place a ruling by a federal judge in Washington, D.C., that allows them to stay in the United States for the time being because of unsafe conditions in their home country. In a 40-page filing, the Haitian nationals told the justices that they will “suffer irreparable—potentially fatal—injury” if that ruling is put on hold.

WASHINGTON, DC - APRIL 25: The U.S. Supreme Court is shown on April 25, 2022 in Washington, DC.
From the SCOTUSblog Team

A 95th birthday tribute to legendary SCOTUSblog reporter Lyle Denniston

The inimitable Lyle Denniston, who served as the primary reporter for SCOTUSblog from 2004 until 2016, celebrated his 95th birthday on Monday. In honor of the occasion, Amy collected 10 of his best stories for SCOTUSblog – one for each decade of his life.

Lyle Denniston
Contributor Corner

Birthright citizenship: a response to Pete Patterson

In their Brothers in Law column, Akhil and Vikram Amar pushed back against a recent SCOTUSblog column by Pete Patterson, in which Patterson contended that the text of the 14th Amendment does not require granting automatic citizenship to babies born to temporary visitors to the U.S.

The United States Capitol building is seen in Washington D.C., United States, on December 9, 2025

SCOTUS Quote

JUSTICE JACKSON: “Yes. As you might imagine, I would like to circle back to the concerns that the Chief Justice and Justice Kavanaugh raised about vacatur and the argument that you’re making in this case. And –”

JUSTICE KAGAN: “Seems to be a kind of D.C. Circuit cartel.”

United States v. Texas (2022)

Recommended Citation: Kelsey Dallas and Nora Collins, SCOTUStoday for Tuesday, March 17, SCOTUSblog (Mar. 17, 2026, 9:00 AM), https://www.scotusblog.com/2026/03/scotustoday-for-tuesday-march-17/