WHAT WE'RE READING
The morning read for Wednesday, January 31
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/27ed7/27ed7426ce61b9940b7605d4127d4840fd8042cb" alt=""
on Jan 31, 2024 at 6:13 am
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f95b2/f95b28d10cc8a81682325895c9afcfe1db21706b" alt=""
Each weekday, we select a short list of news articles, commentary, and other noteworthy links related to the Supreme Court. Here’s the Wednesday morning read:
- White House tells Supreme Court diversity at West Point key to winning wars (Kelsey Reichmann, Courthouse News Service)
- Abortion Pill Supreme Court Case Gets Wave of Support for FDA (Ian Lopez, Bloomberg Law)
- Exclusive: UNC pays anti-affirmative action group $4.8 million after US Supreme Court loss (Nate Raymond, Reuters)
- ACLU warns Supreme Court that lower court abortion pill decisions relied on “patently unreliable witnesses” (Melissa Quinn, CBD News)
- A State Supreme Court Just Issued the Most Devastating Rebuke of Dobbs Yet (Dahlia Lithwick & Mark Joseph Stern, Slate)