Wednesday round-up

According to Pete Williams of NBC News, [t]he court disclosed Tuesday that [Justice Sonia] Sotomayor took herself off a case from Colorado involving a challenge to a state law directing how presidential electors must cast their votes, because of a personal friendship with one of the challengers. At CNN, Ariane de Vogue reports that [t]here are two cases, one from Colorado and one from Washington state, before the justices; although the Court had initially consolidated the cases, on Tuesday it said it would unlink them and hear separate oral arguments.

Briefly:

• At The Hill (via How Appealing), Harper Neidig reports that Mark Janus, [a]n anti-union advocate who won a landmark Supreme Court case two years ago[,] is now asking the court to order a public sector labor group to pay back the union dues that it had ruled unconstitutional.
• At The American Prospect, Felicia Kornbluh weighs in on in June Medical Services v. Russo, a challenge to a Louisiana law regulating abortion, observing that [b]ecause the potential consequences of Louisianas initiative are so severe, the case is really a test of whether a state can effectively legislate abortion out of existence without criminalizing patients or doctors for seeking or providing it per se, or by attackingRoe v. Wade head-on.
• At the White Collar Crime Prof Blog, Ellen Podgor writes that a ruling for the president in upcoming cases involving his efforts to shield his financial records from subpoenas issued to his accountant and lenders would mean that a President could engage in conduct that could never be scrutinized.

We relyon our readers to send us links for our round-up.If you have or know of a recent (published in the last two or three days) article, post, podcast or op-ed relating to the Supreme Court that youd like us to consider for inclusion in the round-up, please send it to roundup [at] scotus-blog.vipdev.lndo.site. Thank you!