6 articles
Mitch Stoltz is a Staff Attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation Wednesday’s decision in American Broadcasting Cos. v. Aereo raises a big question about the right sources of interpretive authority in copyright cases.
Peter S. Menell is Koret Professor of Law and Director, Berkeley Center for Law & Technology, University of California at Berkeley. David Nimmer is Professor from Practice, UCLA School of Law; Of Counsel, Irell & Manella LLP. They filed an amicus brief in support of the broadcasters.
Matt Schruers is VP, Law & Policy at the Computer & Communications Industry Association, which submitted a brief in support of Aereo, its member, in this case.
Terry Hart is Director of Legal Policy for the Copyright Alliance and blogs on his own behalf at Copyhype.com The highly anticipated opinion in American Broadcasting Cos. v. Aereo, Inc. finally answered the question whether the start-up performed copyrighted works to the public.
ABC v. Aereo was always going to come down to a battle of two metaphors: 1. Aereo is a cable company (or at least the functional equivalent of a cable company).
Eleanor M. Lackman is a partner at Cowan, DeBaets, Abrahams & Sheppard LLP. She filed an amicus brief on behalf of the Copyright Alliance and several professors in support of the networks.