Skip to main content

Taylor v. Riojas

Docket No.19-1261
Op. Below5th Cir.

Holding

Because any reasonable correctional officer should have realized that Trent Taylor's conditions of confinement offended the Eighth Amendment, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit erred in granting the officers qualified immunity.

Judgment

Granted, vacated and remanded, 7-1 on Nov 2, 2020. Justice Alito filed an opinion concurring in the judgment. Justice Thomas dissented. Justice Barrett took no part in the consideration of decision of this case.

Proceedings & orders timeline

Apr 24, 2020
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 1, 2020)
May 4, 2020
Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 1, 2020 to July 1, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
May 5, 2020
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 1, 2020.
May 14, 2020
Brief amici curiae of Cross-Ideological Groups Dedicated to Ensuring Official Accountability, Restoring the Public's Trust in Law Enforcement, and Promoting the Rule of Law filed.
Jun 1, 2020
Brief amicus curiae of Constitutional Accountability Center filed.
Jun 24, 2020
Brief of respondents Robert Riojas, et al. in opposition filed.
Jul 7, 2020
Reply of petitioner Trent Michael Taylor filed. (Distributed)
Jul 8, 2020
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
Oct 5, 2020
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/9/2020.
Oct 5, 2020
Record Requested.
Oct 6, 2020
Record received from the U.S.C.A. for the Fifth Circuit. The record is available on PACER.
Oct 7, 2020
Record received from the U.S.D.C. for the Northern District of Texas. The electronic record on appeal (including sealed materials) was received.
Oct 13, 2020
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/16/2020.
Oct 26, 2020
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/30/2020.
Nov 2, 2020
Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. Justice Barrett took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. Justice Thomas dissents. Justice Alito, concurring in the judgment. Opinion per curiam. (Detached Opinion)
Dec 4, 2020
JUDGMENT ISSUED.

Welcome to SCOTUSblog

Tell us a bit about yourself so we can tailor what you see. You can update these any time in your account.