Polaris Innovations Ltd. v. Kingston Technology Co.
Linked with United States v. Arthrex Inc. (19-1434), Smith & Nephew Inc. v. Arthrex Inc. (19-1452), Arthrex Inc. v. Smith & Nephew Inc. (19-1458)
Pending Petition
Issue
(1) Whether severance of the tenure protections for administrative patent judges was unavailable to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Arthrex Inc. v. Smith & Nephew Inc. to remedy the violation of the Constitution's appointments clause by the inter partes review statute because Congress would have maintained such protection for APJs; and (2) whether the Arthrex decision"s removal of APJ tenure protections is insufficient to cure the violation of the appointments clause by the IPR statute.
Jun 30, 2020Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 5, 2020)Jul 20, 2020Blanket Consent filed by Respondent, United States VIDEDJul 21, 2020Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Polaris Innovations Limited VIDEDJul 22, 2020Memorandum of respondent United States filed. VIDED.Jul 29, 2020Brief amicus curiae of The New York Intellectual Property Law Association filed.Aug 5, 2020Brief amicus curiae of TiVo Corporation filed.
Aug 12, 2020DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
Oct 5, 2020DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/9/2020.
Jun 21, 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/24/2021.
Jun 28, 2021Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of United States v. Arthrex, Inc., 594 U. S. ___ (2021).
Jul 30, 2021JUDGMENT ISSUED.
Recommended Citation: Polaris Innovations Ltd. v. Kingston Technology Co., SCOTUSblog, https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/polaris-innovations-ltd-v-kingston-technology-co/