Maracich v. Spears
Holding
An attorney"s solicitation of clients is not a permissible purpose covered by the "litigation exception" to the federal Driver's Privacy Protection Act.
Judgment
Vacated and remanded, 5-4, in an opinion by Anthony McLeod Kennedy on Jun 17, 2013. Justice Ginsburg filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justice Scalia, Justice Sotomayor, and Justice Kagan joined.
Holding: An attorney”s solicitation of clients is not a permissible purpose covered by the “litigation exception” to the federal Driver’s Privacy Protection Act.
Judgment:”Vacated and remanded, 5-4, in an opinion by Justice Kennedy on June 17, 2013. Justice Ginsburg filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justice Scalia, Justice Sotomayor, and Justice Kagan joined.
Recommended Citation: Maracich v. Spears, SCOTUSblog, https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/maracich-v-spears-2/