Lambert v. Louisiana
Certiorari Denied
Petition for certiorari denied on November 21, 2022.
Docket No.22-81
Op. BelowLa. Ct. App.
Issue
(1) Whether prejudice is required, and if so what prejudice counts, in determining which test applies to excessive sentencing-delay claims under the due process clause; and (2) whether, in a prosecution under a multi-count indictment on a common set of facts, the judgment becomes final for purposes of Griffith v. Kentucky when all counts are resolved, or defendants on direct appeal are instead required to seek certiorari from each count when other counts remain unresolved.
Jul 25, 2022Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 26, 2022)Aug 4, 2022Waiver of right of respondent Louisiana to respond filed.
Aug 10, 2022DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
Aug 19, 2022Response Requested. (Due September 19, 2022)
Aug 29, 2022Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 19, 2022 to October 19, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.Aug 30, 2022Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 19, 2022.
Oct 19, 2022Brief of respondent Louisiana in opposition filed.Nov 2, 2022DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/18/2022.
Nov 7, 2022Reply of petitioner Nathaniel Lambert filed. (Distributed)Nov 21, 2022Petition DENIED.
Recommended Citation: Lambert v. Louisiana, SCOTUSblog, https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/lambert-v-louisiana/