Kisela v. Hughes
Holding
Police officer Andrew Kisela is entitled to qualified immunity because his actions did not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.
Judgment
Reversed and remanded, n/a on Apr 2, 2018. Justice Sotomayor filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justice Ginsburg joined.
Sep 25, 2017Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 30, 2017)
Oct 20, 2017Order extending time to file response to petition to and including December 4, 2017.
Dec 4, 2017Brief of respondent Amy Hughes in opposition filed.Dec 18, 2017Reply of petitioner Andrew Kisela filed.Dec 20, 2017DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/5/2018.
Jan 8, 2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/12/2018.
Jan 16, 2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/19/2018.
Feb 5, 2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2018.
Feb 20, 2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/23/2018.
Feb 26, 2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/2/2018.
Mar 12, 2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/16/2018.
Mar 19, 2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/23/2018.
Mar 26, 2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/29/2018.
Apr 2, 2018Petition for certiorari GRANTED, Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED Justice Sotomayor, with whom Justice Ginsburg joins, dissenting. Opinion per curiam. (Detached Opinion)
May 4, 2018JUDGMENT ISSUED.
Recommended Citation: Kisela v. Hughes, SCOTUSblog, https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/kisela-v-hughes/