Kansas v. Cheever
Holding
When a defense expert who has examined the defendant testifies that the defendant lacked the requisite mental state to commit a crime, the prosecution may offer evidence from a court-ordered psychological examination for the limited purpose of rebutting the defendant's evidence.
Judgment
Vacated and remanded, 9-0, in an opinion by Sonia Sotomayor on Dec 11, 2013.
Issue: Whether, when a criminal defendant affirmatively introduces expert testimony that he lacked the requisite mental state to commit capital murder of a law enforcement officer due to the alleged temporary and long-term effects of the defendant”s methamphetamine use, the state violates the defendant”s Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination by rebutting the defendant”s mental state defense with evidence from a court-ordered mental evaluation of the defendant.
Recommended Citation: Kansas v. Cheever, SCOTUSblog, https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/kansas-v-cheever/