Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. v. VIP Products LLC
Holding
When a defendant in a trademark suit uses the mark as a designation of source for its own goods or services (i.e., as a trademark), the threshold Rogers test for trademark infringement claims challenging so-called expressive works, see Rogers v. Grimaldi, does not apply, and the Lanham Act's exclusion from liability for "[a]ny noncommerical use of a mark" does not shield parody, criticism, or commentary from a claim of trademark dilution.
Judgment
Vacated and remanded, 9-0, in an opinion by Elena Kagan on Jun 8, 2023. Justice Sotomayor filed a concurring opinion, in which Justice Alito joined. Justice Gorsuch filed a concurring opinion, in which Justices Thomas and Barrett joined.
Recommended Citation: Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. v. VIP Products LLC, SCOTUSblog, https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/jack-daniels-properties-inc-v-vip-products-llc-2/