Harris v. Quinn
Holding
The First Amendment prohibits the collection of an agency fee from the plaintiffs in this case, home health care providers who do not wish to join or support a union.
Judgment
Reversed in part, affirmed in part, and remanded, 5-4, in an opinion by Samuel Alito on Jun 30, 2014. Justice Kagan filed a dissenting opinion in which Justice Ginsburg, Justice Breyer, and Justice Sotomayor joined.
Issue: (1) Whether a state may, consistent with the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, compel personal care providers to accept and financially support a private organization as their exclusive representative to petition the state for greater reimbursements from its Medicaid programs; and (2) whether the lower court erred in holding that the claims of providers in the Home Based Support Services Program are not ripe for judicial review.
Recommended Citation: Harris v. Quinn, SCOTUSblog, https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/harris-v-quinn/