Department of Homeland Security v. MacLean
Holding
A federal air marshal who publicly disclosed that the TSA had decided to cut costs by removing air marshals from certain long-distance flights is entitled to protection under the federal whistleblower statute because his disclosure does not fall within the statute"s exception for disclosures "specifically prohibited by law." Although the disclosure was specifically prohibited by a TSA regulation, the exception does not apply to rules and regulations, nor was it specifically prohibited by the statute that authorized the TSA to promulgate those regulations.
Judgment
Affirmed, 7-2, in an opinion by John Roberts on Jan 21, 2015. Justice Sotomayor filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justice Kennedy joined.
Recommended Citation: Department of Homeland Security v. MacLean, SCOTUSblog, https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/department-of-homeland-security-v-maclean/