Wade v. Kreisler Law, P.C.
Petition for certiorari denied on March 9, 2020
Issue: Whether the "functional equivalence" doctrine applies to nonjurisdictional mandatory claim-processing rules requiring a petition for permission to appeal.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Petitions of the week (Andrew Hamm, February 20, 2020)
| Date | Proceedings and Orders |
|---|---|
| 09/05/2019 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 10, 2019) |
| 10/23/2019 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/8/2019. |
| 10/30/2019 | Response Requested. (Due November 29, 2019) |
| 02/07/2020 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 29, 2019 to February 11, 2020, submitted to The Clerk. |
| 02/10/2020 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 11, 2020. |
| 02/10/2020 | Brief of respondent Kreisler Law, P.C. in opposition filed. |
| 02/14/2020 | Reply of petitioners Harold Wade, et al. filed. |
| 02/19/2020 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/6/2020. |
| 03/09/2020 | Petition DENIED. |