Uber Technologies, Inc. v. Gregg
Petition for a writ of certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for further consideration in light of Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. Moriana.
| Docket No. | Op. Below | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21-453 | Cal. Ct. App. | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | OT 2021 |
Issue: Whether agreements calling for individual arbitration are enforceable under the Federal Arbitration Act with respect to claims asserted under the California Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act.
| Date | Proceedings and Orders |
|---|---|
| 09/21/2021 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 25, 2021) |
| 10/25/2021 | Brief amicus curiae of the Retail Litigation Center, Inc. filed. |
| 11/09/2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/3/2021. |
| 11/10/2021 | Response Requested. (Due December 10, 2021) |
| 12/03/2021 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 10, 2021 to January 10, 2022, submitted to The Clerk. |
| 12/06/2021 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 10, 2022. |
| 01/10/2022 | Response to petition from respondent Johnathon Gregg filed. |
| 01/12/2022 | Letter from petitioners dated January 12, 2022 filed in reply to the response to the petition for certiorari. |
| 01/26/2022 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022. |
| 06/21/2022 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/23/2022. |
| 06/27/2022 | Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. Moriana, 596 U. S. ___ (2022). |
| 07/29/2022 | JUDGMENT ISSUED |