Trump v. V.O.S. Selections
Consolidated with:
| Docket No. | Op. Below | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25-250 | Fed. Cir. | Nov 5, 2025 | Feb 20, 2026 | 6-3 | Roberts | OT 2025 |
Holding: The International Emergency Economic Powers Act does not authorize the President to impose tariffs.
Judgment: Affirmed, 6-3, in an opinion by Chief Justice Roberts on February 20, 2026. Chief Justice Roberts announced the judgment of the court and delivered the opinion of the court with respect to Parts I, II–A–1, and II–B, in which Justices Sotomayor, Kagan, Gorsuch, Barrett, and Jackson joined, and an opinion with respect to Parts II–A–2 and III, which Justices Gorsuch and Barrett joined. Justices Gorsuch and Barrett wrote concurring opinions. Justice Kagan wrote an opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment, joined by Justices Sotomayor and Jackson. Justice Jackson wrote an opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment. Justice Thomas wrote a dissenting opinion. Justice Kavanaugh wrote a dissenting opinion, joined by Justices Thomas and Alito.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- The major debate over major questions in the tariffs decision is only the beginning (Abbe R. Gluck, February 27, 2026)
- How and why the conservative justices differed on tariffs (Erwin Chemerinsky, February 23, 2026)
- Watching tariffs come down (Mark Walsh, February 20, 2026)
- A breakdown of the court’s tariff decision (Adam Feldman, February 20, 2026)
- Supreme Court strikes down tariffs (Amy Howe, February 20, 2026)
- When will we get the tariffs ruling? (Amy Howe, January 29, 2026)
- How the tariffs could be refunded if the court sides against Trump (Amy Howe, December 18, 2025)
- No Executive Taxation Without Clear Legislative Authorization (Akhil and Vikram Amar, November 7, 2025)
- In tariff cases, verbs rather than major pronouncements about presidential power give the court the off-ramp it’s looking for (Abbe R. Gluck, November 7, 2025)
- Trump’s tariffs: from dollars to donuts (Mark Walsh, November 5, 2025)
- Court appears dubious of Trump’s tariffs (Amy Howe, November 5, 2025)
- The tariffs case and whether amicus briefs matter (Erwin Chemerinsky, November 4, 2025)
- The other arguments in Trump’s tariffs case (Amy Howe, November 4, 2025)
- Oral argument live blog for Wednesday, November 5 (SCOTUSblog, October 24, 2025)
- The Trump docket (Erwin Chemerinsky, October 7, 2025)
- Trump administration urges Supreme Court to uphold tariffs (Amy Howe, September 19, 2025)
- Supreme Court announces it will hear challenges to Trump’s tariffs on Nov. 5 (Amy Howe, September 18, 2025)
- The Supreme Court, tariffs, and judicial consistency (Erwin Chemerinsky, September 15, 2025)
- Supreme Court agrees to decide the fate of Trump’s tariffs (Amy Howe, September 9, 2025)
- Group of small businesses calls on Supreme Court to decide tariffs case (Amy Howe, September 6, 2025)
- Trump administration brings tariffs case to Supreme Court (Amy Howe, September 4, 2025)
| Date | Proceedings and Orders |
|---|---|
| 09/03/2025 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 6, 2025) |
| 09/03/2025 | Motion to expedite consideration of the petition for a writ of certiorari and, if certiorari is granted, briefing and argument on the merits filed by petitioners. |
| 09/05/2025 | Memorandum of respondents V.O.S. Selections, Inc., et al. filed. |
| 09/08/2025 | Brief amici curiae of Advancing American Freedom, et al. filed. |
| 09/08/2025 | Brief of State Respondents in support filed. |
| 09/09/2025 | The motion to expedite and the petition for a writ of certiorari are GRANTED. The petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment in No. 24-1287 is granted. The cases are consolidated, and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument. Respondents in No. 24-1287 and petitioners in No. 25-250 shall file an opening brief on the merits on or before Friday, September 19, 2025. Any amicus curiae briefs in support or in support of neither party shall be filed on or before Tuesday, September 23, 2025. Petitioners in No. 24-1287 and respondents in No. 25-250 shall file response briefs on the merits on or before Monday, October 20, 2025. Any amicus curiae briefs in support shall be filed on or before Friday, October 24, 2025. A reply brief shall be filed by Thursday, October 30, 2025. The cases will be set for argument in the first week of the November 2025 argument session. VIDED. |
| 09/09/2025 | Because the Court has consolidated these cases for briefing and oral argument, future filings and activity in the cases will now be reflected on the docket of No. 24-1287. Subsequent filings in these cases must therefore be submitted through the electronic filing system in No. 24-1287. Each document submitted in connection with one or more of these cases must include on its cover the case number and caption for each case in which the filing is intended to be submitted. Where a filing is submitted in fewer than all of the cases, the docket entry will reflect the case number(s) in which the filing is submitted; a document filed in all of the consolidated cases will be noted as “VIDED.” |
| 09/10/2025 | Record requested from the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. |
| 09/12/2025 | Record received electronically from the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and available with the Clerk. |
| 09/18/2025 | SET FOR ARGUMENT on Wednesday, November 5, 2025. VIDED. |
| 09/21/2025 | Amicus brief of Corey J. Biazzo, Esq. not accepted for filing. (September 23, 2025) |
| 09/22/2025 | Record received from the United States Court of International Trade and available with the Clerk. The record is electronic and is available on PACER. |
| 09/30/2025 | CIRCULATED |
| 11/05/2025 | Argued. For federal parties: D. John Sauer, Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For private parties: Neal K. Katyal, Washington, D. C. For state parties: Benjamin N. Gutman, Solicitor General, Salem, Ore. VIDED. |
| 02/20/2026 | Adjudged to be AFFIRMED. Judgment in No. 24-1287 is VACATED and case REMANDED with instructions to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. Roberts, C. J., announced the judgment of the Court and delivered the opinion of the Court with respect to Parts I, II–A–1, and II–B, in which Sotomayor, Kagan, Gorsuch, Barrett, and Jackson, JJ., joined, and an opinion with respect to Parts II–A–2 and III, in which Gorsuch and Barrett, JJ., joined. Gorsuch, J., and Barrett, J., filed concurring opinions. Kagan, J., filed an opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment, in which Sotomayor and Jackson, JJ., joined. Jackson, J., filed an opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment. Thomas, J., filed a dissenting opinion. Kavanaugh, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Thomas and Alito, JJ., joined. VIDED. |