Suzuki v. Deedy
Petition for certiorari denied on June 22, 2020
Issue: (1) Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit erred in affirming the district court"s exercise of appellate jurisdiction to adjudicate a case brought by a state-court loser complaining of injuries caused by the judgment rendered by the state"s highest court before the district court proceedings commenced and inviting the court to review and reject that judgment; and (2) whether the 9th Circuit erred in concluding that the state trial court"s decision not to charge the jury on reckless manslaughter"a lesser-included offense of murder for which the defendant stood trial"constituted an acquittal of that offense.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Petitions of the week (Andrew Hamm, April 24, 2020)
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
03/18/2020 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 20, 2020) |
04/10/2020 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 20, 2020 to May 20, 2020, submitted to The Clerk. |
04/13/2020 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 20, 2020. |
05/19/2020 | Brief of respondent Christopher Deedy in opposition filed. |
06/02/2020 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/18/2020. |
06/22/2020 | Petition DENIED. |