Sprint Communications v. APCC Services
Docket No. | Op. Below | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
07-552 | D.C. Cir. | Apr 21, 2008 | Jun 23, 2008 | 5-4 | Breyer | OT 2007 |
Disclosure: Akin Gump represented the petitioner in this case.
Holding: An assignee of a legal claim for money owed has standing to pursue that claim in federal court, even when the assignee has promised to remit the proceeds of the litigation to the assignor.
Judgment: Affirmed, 5-4, in an opinion by Justice Stephen Breyer on June 23, 2008. Chief Justice Roberts filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justices Scalia, Thomas, and Alito joined.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- More on Yesterday's Opinion in Sprint v. APCC (Jason Harrow, June 24, 2008)
- Argument Recap: Sprint & AT&T v. APCC (Jason Harrow, April 24, 2008)
- Argument preview: Sprint communications v. APCC Services (Scotus Staff, April 18, 2008)
- Court to rule on death penalty for child rape (Lyle Denniston, January 4, 2008)
Briefs and Documents
- Opinion below (D.C. Circuit)
- Petition for certiorari
- Brief in opposition
- Petitioner”™s reply
- Amicus brief of Qwest Communications, Inc. (in support of the petitioners)
Merits briefs (via ABA)
- Brief for Petitioner Sprint Communications Company L.P. and AT&T Corp.
- Brief for Respondent APCC Services, Inc., et al.
- Reply Brief for Petitioner Sprint Communications Company L.P. and AT&T Corp.
Amicus briefs
- Brief for Qwest Communications Corporation in Support of Petitioner
- Brief for Network IP, LLC and Network Enhanced Telecom, LLP in Support of Petitioner
- Opinion below (D.C. Circuit)
- Petition for certiorari
- Brief in opposition
- Petitioner”™s reply
- Amicus brief of Qwest Communications, Inc. (in support of the petitioners)
Merits briefs (via ABA)
- Brief for Petitioner Sprint Communications Company L.P. and AT&T Corp.
- Brief for Respondent APCC Services, Inc., et al.
- Reply Brief for Petitioner Sprint Communications Company L.P. and AT&T Corp.
Amicus briefs