Skip to content

Salazar v. Paramount Global

Pending petition

Docket No. Op. BelowArgument Opinion Vote Author Term
25-459 6th Cir. TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD

Issue: Whether the phrase “goods or services from a video tape service provider,” as used in the Video Privacy Protection Act's definition of “consumer,” refers to all of a video tape service provider’s goods or services or only to its audiovisual goods or services.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
07/31/2025Application (25A140) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from August 11, 2025 to October 10, 2025, submitted to Justice Kavanaugh.
08/05/2025Application (25A140) granted by Justice Kavanaugh extending the time to file until October 10, 2025.
08/05/2025Opposition to application for extension of time from respondent Paramount Global submitted.
09/05/2025Letter amending corporate disclosure statement of Paramount Global submitted.
10/10/2025Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 14, 2025)
10/28/2025Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 14, 2025 to December 15, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
10/29/2025Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 15, 2025.
12/15/2025Brief of respondent Paramount Global, dba 247 Sports in opposition filed.
12/23/2025Reply of petitioner Michael Salazar filed. (Distributed)
12/30/2025DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/16/2026.
01/20/2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/23/2026.