Skip to content

Salazar-Limon v. City of Houston

Petition for certiorari denied on April 24, 2017

Docket No. Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
16-515 N/A N/A N/A N/A OT 2016

Issue: Whether, when a police officer shoots an unarmed person in the back and the person testifies that he was merely walking away when shot, a court may grant summary judgment to the officer in a suit for excessive force by concluding that it is an "undisputed fact" that the person reached for his waistband just because the officer said he did.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
10/13/2016Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 16, 2016)
11/01/2016Waiver of right of respondents City of Houston, Texas, et al. to respond filed.
11/15/2016DISTRIBUTED for Conference of December 2, 2016.
11/22/2016Response Requested . (Due December 22, 2016)
12/14/2016Order extending time to file response to petition to and including January 23, 2017.
01/23/2017Brief of respondents City of Houston, Texas, et al. in opposition filed.
01/30/2017Reply of petitioner Ricardo Salazar-Limon filed.
02/01/2017DISTRIBUTED for Conference of February 17, 2017.
02/21/2017DISTRIBUTED for Conference of February 24, 2017.
02/27/2017DISTRIBUTED for Conference of March 3, 2017.
03/13/2017DISTRIBUTED for Conference of March 17, 2017.
03/20/2017DISTRIBUTED for Conference of March 24, 2017.
03/27/2017DISTRIBUTED for Conference of March 31, 2017.
04/10/2017DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 13, 2017.
04/17/2017DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 21, 2017.
04/24/2017Petition DENIED. Justice Alito, with whom Justice Thomas joins, concurring in the denial of certiorari. (Detached Opinion). Justice Sotomayor, with whom Justice Ginsburg joins, dissenting from the denial of certiorari. (Detached Opinion)