Robinson v. United States
Petition for certiorari denied on May 21, 2018
Issue: Whether, following Johnson v. United States, in which the Supreme Court invalidated the Armed Career Criminal Act"s residual clause as unconstitutionally vague, identical language in the residual clause of the previously-mandatory sentencing guidelines is likewise unconstitutional.
| Date | Proceedings and Orders |
|---|---|
| 11/20/2017 | Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 27, 2017) |
| 12/19/2017 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 27, 2017 to January 26, 2018, submitted to The Clerk. |
| 12/20/2017 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 26, 2018. |
| 01/26/2018 | Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed. |
| 02/07/2018 | Reply of petitioner Terrance Robinson filed. |
| 02/15/2018 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/2/2018. |
| 03/12/2018 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/16/2018. |
| 03/19/2018 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/23/2018. |
| 03/26/2018 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/29/2018. |
| 04/09/2018 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/13/2018. |
| 04/16/2018 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/20/2018. |
| 04/23/2018 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/27/2018. |
| 05/07/2018 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/10/2018. |
| 05/14/2018 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/17/2018. |
| 05/21/2018 | Petition DENIED. |