Skip to content

Parker-Hannifin Corporation v. Johnson

Pending petition

Docket No. Op. BelowArgument Opinion Vote Author Term
24-1030 6th Cir. TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD

Issue: Whether pleading an imprudent-investment claim under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, based on how the investment’s returns compared to some performance benchmark, requires allegations showing that the benchmark is a sound basis for comparison for that investment. CVSG: 12/09/2025

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
03/26/2025Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 28, 2025)
04/08/2025Waiver of right of respondent Michael D. Johnson, et al. to respond filed.
04/16/2025DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/2/2025.
04/21/2025Response Requested. (Due May 21, 2025)
05/21/2025Brief of respondents Michael D. Johnson, et al. in opposition filed.
05/21/2025Brief amicus curiae of Encore Fiduciary filed.
06/09/2025Reply of petitioners Parker-Hannifin Corporation, et al. filed. (Distributed)
06/10/2025DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/26/2025.
06/30/2025The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States. Justice Alito took no part in the consideration of this petition.
12/09/2025Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.
12/23/2025DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/9/2026.
12/23/2025Supplemental brief of respondents Michael D. Johnson, et al. filed. (Distributed)
12/23/2025Supplemental brief of petitioners Parker-Hannifin Corporation, et al. filed. (Distributed)