Skip to content

Pakdel v. City and County of San Francisco, California

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
20-1212 9th Cir. Not Argued Jun 28, 2021 9-0 Per Curiam OT 2020

Holding: Administrative exhaustion of state remedies is not a prerequisite for a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 takings claim when the government has reached a conclusive position.

Judgment: Vacated and remanded in a per curiam opinion on June 28, 2021.

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
02/26/2021Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 2, 2021)
03/04/2021Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Peyman Pakdel, et al.
03/18/2021Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 2, 2021 to May 3, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
03/23/2021Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 3, 2021.
04/01/2021Brief amici curiae of Southeastern Legal Foundation; National Federation of Independent Business Small Business Legal Center; Texas Public Policy Foundation filed.
04/01/2021Brief amicus curiae of Pelican Institute for Public Policy filed.
04/02/2021Brief amicus curiae of The Cato Institute filed.
05/03/2021Brief of respondents City and County of San Francisco, et al. in opposition filed.
05/14/2021Reply of petitioners Peyman Pakdel, et al. filed. (Distributed)
05/18/2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/3/2021.
06/01/2021Rescheduled.
06/07/2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/10/2021.
06/08/2021Rescheduled.
06/14/2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/17/2021.
06/21/2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/24/2021.
06/28/2021Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for proceedings consistent with the opinion of the Court. Opinion per curiam. (Detached Opinion)
07/30/2021JUDGMENT ISSUED.