Olivar v. Public Service Employee Credit Union Long Term Disability Plan
Petition for certiorari denied on October 1, 2018
Issue: (1) Whether a benefit plan subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, as an entity, is always a proper defendant in an action to recover benefits pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(1)(B), as held by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit, New Mexico Court of Appeals and others, or is an ERISA plan sometimes not a proper defendant as held here by the Colorado Supreme Court and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit; and (2) whether service of process on the Secretary of Labor is proper under 29 U.S.C. § 1132(d)(1) when a summary plan description designates a corporation for service given that ERISA differentiates between an "individual" and a "person" " specifically defining only the term "person" to include corporations.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Petition of the day (Aurora Barnes, May 29, 2018)
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
05/11/2018 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 14, 2018) |
06/06/2018 | Waiver of right of respondents Public Service Employee Credit Union Long Term Disability Plan, et al. to respond filed. |
06/13/2018 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018. |
06/25/2018 | Response Requested. (Due July 25, 2018) |
07/25/2018 | Brief of respondents Public Service Employee Credit Union Long Term Disability Plan, et al. in opposition filed. |
08/08/2018 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018. |
10/01/2018 | Petition DENIED. |