Ohio v. Brinkman
Petition for certiorari denied on February 22, 2022
Issue: (1) Whether the due process clause of the 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution prohibits review of the entire record to determine whether a guilty plea was knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily entered; and (2) whether the Supreme Court should grant certiorari to resolve the conflict among the courts on whether the failure to strictly adhere to the advisement of rights in Boykin v. Alabama should result in the automatic reversal of a guilty plea.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- HIV privacy, guilty pleas, and bribery convictions (Andrew Hamm, November 12, 2021)
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
10/19/2021 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 26, 2021) |
11/09/2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Ohio Prosecuting Attorneys Association filed. |
11/10/2021 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 26, 2021 to December 23, 2021, submitted to The Clerk. |
11/12/2021 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 23, 2021. |
12/23/2021 | Brief of respondent George Brinkman in opposition filed. |
12/23/2021 | Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent George Brinkman. |
01/11/2022 | Reply of petitioner Ohio filed. (Distributed) |
01/12/2022 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022. |
02/22/2022 | Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED. |
02/22/2022 | Petition DENIED. |