Skip to content

New York v. Environmental Protection Agency

Petition for certiorari denied on February 26, 2018

Docket No. Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
17-418 N/A N/A N/A N/A OT 2017

Issue: (1) Whether the Environmental Protection Agency's Water Transfers Rule conflicts with the plain meaning of the Clear Water Act by concluding that a water transfer's introduction of pollutants to a navigable water body is not an "addition of any pollutant to navigable waters" within the meaning of the Act; and (2) whether the EPA may justify the Water Transfers Rule on the basis of perceived costs and benefits caused by the Act's permitting process, when it expressly declined to conduct any actual assessment of the costs or benefits of permitting.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
07/06/2017Application (17A65) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from July 17, 2017 to September 15, 2017, submitted to Justice Ginsburg.
07/14/2017Application (17A65) granted by Justice Ginsburg extending the time to file until September 15, 2017.
09/15/2017Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 19, 2017)
10/12/2017Order extending time to file response to petition to and including November 20, 2017.
11/09/2017Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including January 19, 2018, for all respondents.
01/19/2018Brief of Federal Respondents in opposition filed. VIDED.
01/19/2018Brief of respondent City of New York in opposition filed.
01/19/2018Brief of Intervenor-Respondents Western States and Western Water Providers in opposition filed. VIDED.
02/02/2018Reply of petitioners New York, et al. filed.
02/07/2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/23/2018.
02/26/2018Petition DENIED.