May v. Shinn
Petition for certiorari denied on February 21, 2023
Issue: Whether a judgment rendered after a habeas petitioner has been unconditionally released with no collateral consequences " and where the state does not dispute that the petitioner was no longer "in custody" pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 " is void for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Justices asked to weigh in again on mixed questions in immigration appeals (Kalvis Golde, February 10, 2023)
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
10/25/2022 | Application (22A346) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from November 17, 2022 to January 16, 2023, submitted to Justice Kagan. |
10/26/2022 | Application (22A346) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until January 16, 2023. |
01/13/2023 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 21, 2023) |
01/23/2023 | Waiver of right of respondent David Shinn, Director; Mark Brnovich, Attorney General to respond filed. |
01/25/2023 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/17/2023. |
02/21/2023 | Petition DENIED. |