Koninklijke Philips N.V. v. Washington
Petition for certiorari denied on January 9, 0017
Issue: Whether the due process clause permits a forum state to exercise specific personal jurisdiction over a nonresident defendant based solely on that defendant's placing component parts into the stream of commerce by selling them to third parties who make finished products that foreseeably may come to the forum state.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Petition of the day (Kate Howard, December 22, 2016)
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
10/19/2016 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 28, 2016) |
11/23/2016 | Order extending time to file response to petition to and including December 21, 2016. |
11/28/2016 | Brief amici curiae of The Chamber of Commerce of The United States of America, et al. filed. |
12/21/2016 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 6, 2017. |
12/21/2016 | Letter of December 19, 2016, from counsel for petitioner received waiving the 14-day waiting period for the distribution of the petition pursuant to Rule 15.5. |
12/21/2016 | Brief of respondent Washington in opposition filed. (Distributed) |
12/23/2016 | Reply of petitioners Koninklijke Philips N.V., aka Royal Philips, et al. filed. (Distributed) |
01/09/2017 | Petition DENIED. |