Kentner v. City of Sanibel

Petition for certiorari denied on January 12, 2015

Docket No.	Op. Below	Argument	Opinion	Vote	Author	Term
14-404	11th Cir.	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	OT 2014

Issue: (1) Whether traditional property rights are among those fundamental rights and liberties subject to the substantive protections of due process, per Lingle v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc., Nectow v. City of Cambridge, and Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.; and (2) whether a regulatory restriction on the right to use one's property "must substantially advance a legitimate state interest" to satisfy the substantive requirement of due process, per Lingle, Nectow, and Euclid.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

Petition of the day (Maureen Johnston, January 9, 2015)

Date	Proceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
07/22/2014	Application (14A103) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from August 6, 2014 to October 3, 2014, submitted to Justice Thomas.
07/28/2014	Application (14A103) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until October 3, 2014.
10/03/2014	Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 6, 2014)
10/21/2014	Order extending time to file response to petition to and including November 26, 2014.
10/31/2014	Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioners.
11/03/2014	Brief amici curiae of National Federation of Independent Business Small Business Legal Center, et al. filed.
11/06/2014	Brief amicus curiae of Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence filed.
11/26/2014	Brief of respondent City of Sanibel, Florida in opposition filed.
12/09/2014	Reply of petitioners David Kentner, Susan A.Kentner, et al. filed. (Distributed)
12/10/2014	DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 9, 2015.
01/12/2015	Petition DENIED.