Idaho v. Howard
Petition for certiorari denied on October 3, 2022
Issue: Whether, when officers lawfully deploy a narcotics-detection dog on the exterior of a vehicle and, without any direction, prompting, or facilitation by officers, the dog briefly touches the vehicle or places its snout through an open window, the dog"s conduct constitutes a Fourth Amendment search by officers.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Suing the International Finance Corporation, and Chicago polices destroy-or-sell policy (Andrew Hamm, January 21, 2022)
| Date | Proceedings and Orders |
|---|---|
| 01/03/2022 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 7, 2022) |
| 02/23/2022 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/18/2022. |
| 03/17/2022 | Response Requested. (Due April 18, 2022) |
| 04/08/2022 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 18, 2022 to June 17, 2022, submitted to The Clerk. |
| 04/11/2022 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including June 17, 2022. |
| 06/13/2022 | Brief of respondent Aaron James Howard in opposition filed. |
| 06/13/2022 | Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Aaron James Howard. |
| 06/29/2022 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022. |
| 08/16/2022 | Reply of petitioner Idaho filed. (Distributed) |
| 10/03/2022 | Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED. |
| 10/03/2022 | Petition DENIED. |