Florida v. Deviney
Petition for certiorari denied on November 4, 2013
Issue: (1) Whether the decision of the Florida Supreme Court, holding that a suspect expressing his desire to go home unequivocally and unambiguously invoked his right to remain silent under Miranda v. Arizona , conflicts with Davis v. United States, Berghuis v. Thompkins, and decisions of federal and state appellate courts; and (2) whether a suspect's confession to his mother, while alone with her in a police interview room at his request, must be excluded as the fruit of an earlier confession to the police that violated Miranda.
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
08/21/2013 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 27, 2013) |
08/27/2013 | Application (13A217) for a stay pending disposition of the petition for a writ of certiorari, submitted to Justice Thomas. |
09/05/2013 | Response to application (13A217) requested by Justice Thomas, due Thursday, September 12, 2013, by 4 p.m. |
09/12/2013 | Response to application from respondent Randall T. Deviney filed. |
09/16/2013 | Application (13A217) denied by Justice Thomas. |
09/26/2013 | Brief of respondent Randall T. Deviney in opposition filed. |
09/26/2013 | Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Randall T. Deviney. |
10/16/2013 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of November 1, 2013. |
11/04/2013 | Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED. |
11/04/2013 | Petition DENIED. |