Duke University v. Biomarin Pharmaceutical Inc.
Petition for certiorari denied on November 9, 2020
Issue: (1) Whether a court of appeals can invoke forfeiture to refuse to address an appointments-clause violation in a pending appeal despite an intervening change in law; and (2) whether the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Director"s delegation of authority to institute inter partes reviews to administrative patent judges acting as principal officers outside the director"s review violates 35 U.S.C. § 314, which vests institution authority solely in the director; and (3) whether establishing a nexus between a patentee"s invention and objective evidence of nonobviousness under Graham v. John Deere Co. requires the patentee to negate every other conceivable reason for a product"s commercial success and industry praise.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Petitions of the week: Abortion, alcohol, appointments and more (Andrew Hamm, July 30, 2020)
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
07/02/2020 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 7, 2020) |
07/21/2020 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 7, 2020 to October 6, 2020, submitted to The Clerk. |
07/29/2020 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 6, 2020. |
10/06/2020 | Brief of respondent BioMarin Pharmaceutical, Inc. in opposition filed. |
10/19/2020 | Reply of petitioner Duke University filed. (Distributed) |
10/21/2020 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/6/2020. |
11/09/2020 | Petition DENIED. |