Direct Digital, LLC v. Mullins
Petition for certiorari denied on February 29, 2016
Issue: Whether a court may certify a class under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(3) where the plaintiff fails to make any showing of a reliable and administratively feasible means for ascertaining class membership.
| Date | Proceedings and Orders |
|---|---|
| 10/26/2015 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 27, 2015) |
| 10/30/2015 | Order extending time to file response to petition to and including December 28, 2015. |
| 11/17/2015 | Blanket consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the respondent. |
| 11/25/2015 | Brief amicus curiae of Product Liability Advisory Council, Inc. filed. |
| 11/25/2015 | Brief amicus curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America filed. |
| 11/25/2015 | Brief amicus curiae of DRI-The Voice of the Defense Bar filed. |
| 11/27/2015 | Brief amicus curiae of Atlantic Legal Foundation filed. |
| 12/02/2015 | Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including December 29, 2015. |
| 12/29/2015 | Brief of respondents Vince Mullins, et al. in opposition filed. |
| 01/12/2016 | Reply of petitioner Direct Digital, LLC filed. |
| 01/13/2016 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of February 19, 2016. |
| 02/29/2016 | Petition DENIED. |