Casey v. United States
Petition for certiorari denied on June 25, 2018
Issue: Whether a court may grant a federal habeas petition collaterally challenging a sentence under Johnson v. United States, which held that a sentence enhanced under the "residual clause" of the Armed Career Criminal Act violated the Due Process Clause, when the sentencing judge never specified"and therefore the record is silent on"whether the petitioner"s original sentence was enhanced pursuant to the ACCA"s now-invalidated residual clause.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Petition of the day (Aurora Barnes, April 17, 2018)
| Date | Proceedings and Orders |
|---|---|
| 03/08/2018 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 9, 2018) |
| 04/05/2018 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 9, 2018 to May 9, 2018, submitted to The Clerk. |
| 04/06/2018 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 9, 2018 |
| 04/16/2018 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 9, 2018 to May 25, 2018, submitted to The Clerk. |
| 04/17/2018 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including May 25, 2018. |
| 05/22/2018 | Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed. |
| 06/04/2018 | Reply of petitioner Charles H. Casey, Jr. filed. |
| 06/05/2018 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/21/2018. |
| 06/25/2018 | Petition DENIED. |