Carson v. Hyland
Petition for certiorari denied on April 17, 2023
Issue: Whether Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 abrogates the Supreme Court"s holdings that payments in common-fund class actions to compensate representative plaintiffs for their personal services are inequitable, "illegal" and "decidedly objectionable."
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Arthrex seeks second Supreme Court intervention in patent clash (Kalvis Golde, January 27, 2023)
| Date | Proceedings and Orders |
|---|---|
| 01/05/2023 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 8, 2023) |
| 01/27/2023 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 8, 2023 to March 10, 2023, submitted to The Clerk. |
| 01/30/2023 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 10, 2023, for all respondents. |
| 02/27/2023 | Waiver of right of respondent William Yeatman to respond filed. |
| 03/10/2023 | Brief of respondents Kathryn Hyland, et al. in opposition filed. VIDED. |
| 03/10/2023 | Brief of respondents Navient Corporation and Navient Solutions, LLC in opposition filed. VIDED. |
| 03/28/2023 | Reply of petitioner Richard Estle Carson III filed.(Distributed) |
| 03/29/2023 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/14/2023. |
| 04/17/2023 | Petition DENIED. |