Biestek v. Berryhill
Docket No. | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
17-1184 | Dec 4, 2018 | Apr 1, 2019 | 6-3 | Kagan | OT 2018 |
Holding: A vocational expert"s refusal to provide private market-survey data during a Social Security disability benefits hearing upon the applicant"s request does not categorically preclude the testimony from counting as "substantial evidence" in federal court under 42 U. S. C. "405(g).
Judgment: Affirmed, 6-3, in an opinion by Justice Kagan on April 1, 2019. Justice Sotomayor filed a dissenting opinion. Justice Gorsuch filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justice Ginsburg joined.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Opinion analysis: Court rejects per se rule on cross-examination in Social Security disability cases (David Super, April 2, 2019)
- OT2018 #11: "A Lot Of Meatballs" (First Mondays, December 10, 2018)
- Argument analysis: Justices wrestle with scope of cross-examination of social security experts (David Super, December 6, 2018)
- Argument preview: Justices to consider social security disability claimants ability to scrutinize data on which benefits denials are based (David Super, November 27, 2018)
- Court sends battles over services for same-sex couples, North Carolina gerrymandering back to lower courts (Updated) (Amy Howe, June 25, 2018)
- Petition of the day (Aurora Barnes, March 29, 2018)
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
02/21/2018 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 26, 2018) |
02/21/2018 | Pursuant to Rule 34.6 and Paragraph 9 of the Guidelines for the Submission of Documents to the Supreme Court’s Electronic Filing System, filings in this case should be submitted in paper form only, and should not be submitted through the Court’s electronic filing system. |
03/20/2018 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 26, 2018 to April 25, 2018, submitted to The Clerk. |
03/21/2018 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 25, 2018. |
04/20/2018 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 25, 2018 to May 14, 2018, submitted to The Clerk. |
04/20/2018 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including May 14, 2018. |
05/14/2018 | Brief of respondent Nancy A. Berryhill, Deputy Commissioner for Operations, Social Security Administration in opposition filed. |
05/21/2018 | Reply of petitioner Michael J. Biestek filed. |
05/22/2018 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/7/2018. |
06/11/2018 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/14/2018. |
06/18/2018 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/21/2018. |
06/25/2018 | Petition GRANTED. |
06/25/2018 | As Rule 34.6 provides, “If the Court schedules briefing and oral argument in a case that was governed by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c) or Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 49.1(c), the parties shall submit electronic versions of all prior and subsequent filings with this Court in the case, subject to [applicable] redaction rules.” Subsequent party and amicus filings in the case should now be submitted through the Court’s electronic filing system, with any necessary redactions. |
07/13/2018 | Joint motion for an extension of time to file the opening briefs on the merits filed. |
07/13/2018 | Joint motion to extend the time to file the opening briefs on the merits granted. The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including August 27, 2018. The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including October 15, 2018. |
08/03/2018 | Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Michael J. Biestek |
08/03/2018 | Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner Michael J. Biestek. |
08/27/2018 | Brief of petitioner Michael J. Biestek filed. |
09/04/2018 | Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Disability Representatives filed. |
09/04/2018 | Brief amici curiae of National Organization of Social Security Claimants' Representatives, et al. filed. |
10/01/2018 | Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner GRANTED. |
10/09/2018 | SET FOR ARGUMENT on Tuesday, December 4, 2018 |
10/15/2018 | Record received from the U.S.C.A. 6th Circuit. |
10/15/2018 | Brief of Nancy A. Berryhill, Deputy Commissioner for Operations, Social Security Administration not accepted for filing. (Revised brief submitted - 10/16/18) |
10/15/2018 | Brief of respondent Nancy A. Berryhill, Deputy Commissioner for Operations, Social Security Administration filed. (10/16/18) |
10/19/2018 | CIRCULATED |
11/14/2018 | Reply of petitioner Michael J. Biestek filed. (Distributed) |
12/04/2018 | Argued. For petitioner: Ishan Bhabha, Washington, D. C. For respondent: Anthony A. Yang, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. |
04/01/2019 | Adjudged to be AFFIRMED. Kagan, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Thomas, Breyer, Alito, and Kavanaugh, JJ., joined. Sotomayor, J., filed a dissenting opinion. Gorsuch, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Ginsburg, J., joined. |
05/03/2019 | JUDGMENT ISSUED. |