Skip to content

AT&T Mobility LLC v. McArdle

Petition for certiorari denied on June 1, 2020

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
19-1078 9th Cir. N/A N/A N/A N/A OT 2019

Issue: Whether California"s public-policy rule conditioning the enforceability of arbitration agreements on acquiescence to public-injunction proceedings is preempted by the Federal Arbitration Act.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
02/27/2020Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 2, 2020)
03/18/2020Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 2, 2020 to April 24, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
03/19/2020Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 24, 2020.
03/24/2020Brief amicus curiae of Washington Legal Foundation filed. VIDED.
03/25/2020Brief amicus curiae of CTIA - The Wireless Association filed. VIDED.
03/26/2020Brief amici curiae of American Bankers Association; Consumer Bankers Association filed. VIDED.
03/27/2020Brief amici curiae of DRI - The Voice of the Defense Bar filed. VIDED.
03/30/2020Brief amici curiae of The Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. filed. VIDED.
04/24/2020Brief of respondent Steven McArdle in opposition filed.
05/11/2020Reply of petitioners AT&T Mobility LLC, et al. filed.
05/12/2020DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/28/2020.
06/01/2020Petition DENIED.