Skip to content

Armstrong v. Exceptional Child Center, Inc.

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
14-15 9th Cir. Jan 20, 2015 Mar 31, 2015 5-4 Scalia OT 2014

Holding: Medicaid providers do not have a cause of action to challenge a state"s reimbursement rates.

Judgment: Reversed, 5-4, in an opinion by Justice Scalia on March 31, 2015. Chief Justice Roberts, and Justices Thomas, Breyer, and Alito join the opinion as to Parts I, II, and III. Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Thomas and Alito also join as to Part IV. Justice Breyer filed an opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgement. Justice Sotomayor filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justices Kennedy, Ginsburg, and Kagan joined.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
07/02/2014Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 6, 2014)
07/29/2014Order extending time to file response to petition to and including September 5, 2014.
08/06/2014Brief amici curiae of Texas, et al. filed.
08/27/2014Brief of respondents Exceptional Child Center, Inc., et al. in opposition filed.
09/09/2014Reply of petitioners Richard Armstrong, et al. filed.
09/10/2014DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 29, 2014.
10/02/2014Petition GRANTED limited to Question 1 presented by the petition.
11/17/2014Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed)
11/17/2014Brief of petitioners Richard Armstrong, et al. filed.
11/17/2014Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioners.
11/19/2014Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the respondents.
11/21/2014SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Tuesday, January 20, 2015
11/24/2014Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.
11/24/2014Brief amici curiae of Texas, et al. filed.
11/24/2014Brief amici curiae of National Governors Association, et al. filed.
11/24/2014Brief amicus curiae of California Health and Human Services Agency filed.
12/02/2014Record requested from U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit.
12/02/2014Record requested from U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit is electronic and located on PACER.
12/02/2014Record from U.S.D.C. District of Idaho is electronic and located on PACER.
12/12/2014CIRCULATED.
12/17/2014Brief of respondents Exceptional Child Center, Inc., et al. filed. (Distributed)
12/18/2014Brief amicus curiae of Medicaid Defense Fund filed. (Distributed)
12/19/2014Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.
12/22/2014Brief amici curiae of National Health Law Program, et al. filed. (Distributed)
12/22/2014Brief amici curiae of American Civil Liberties Union, et al., filed. Distributed.
12/23/2014Brief amici curiae of The American Network of Community Options and Resources, et al. filed. (Distributed)
12/23/2014Brief amici curiae of The American Hospital Association, and Federation of American Hospitals filed. (Distributed)
12/23/2014Brief amici curiae of Former HHS Officials filed. (Distributed).
12/23/2014Brief amici curiae of American Medical Association, et al., filed. (Distributed)
12/23/2014Brief amicus curiae of Constitutional Accountability Center filed. (Distributed)
12/24/2014Brief amici curiae of Members of Congress filed. (Distributed)
12/24/2014Brief amici curiae of American Association of People with Disabilities, et al., filed. (Distributed).
12/24/2014Brief amicus curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America filed. (Distributed)
01/09/2015Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.
01/13/2015Reply of petitioners Richard Armstrong, et al. filed. (Distributed)
01/20/2015Argued. For petitioners: Carl J. Withroe, Deputy Attorney General, Boise, Idaho; and Edwin S. Kneedler, Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.) For respondents: James M. Piotrowski, Boise, Idaho.
03/31/2015Judgment REVERSED. Scalia, J., delivered the opinion of the Court with respect to Parts I, II, and III, in which Roberts, C. J., and Thomas, Breyer, and Alito, JJ., joined, and an opinion with respect to Part IV, in which Roberts, C. J., and Thomas and Alito, JJ., joined. Breyer, J., filed an opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment. Sotomayor, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Kennedy, Ginsburg, and Kagan, JJ., joined.
05/04/2015JUDGMENT ISSUED.