Arizona v. Martin
Petition for certiorari denied on May 18, 2020
Issue: Whether, when a jury expressly states it is "unable to agree" on a defendant"s guilt for a greater offense and convicts the defendant of a lesser offense, and the defendant successfully appeals his conviction, the hung-jury rule permits retrial of the greater offense or Green v. United States instead bars retrial of that offense.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Petitions of the week (Andrew Hamm, December 13, 2019)
| Date | Proceedings and Orders |
|---|---|
| 11/07/2019 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 12, 2019) |
| 12/04/2019 | Waiver of right of respondent Philip Martin to respond filed. |
| 12/18/2019 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020. |
| 01/06/2020 | Response Requested. (Due February 5, 2020) |
| 01/09/2020 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 5, 2020 to March 6, 2020, submitted to The Clerk. |
| 01/13/2020 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 6, 2020. |
| 02/05/2020 | Brief amici curiae of Kentucky, et al. filed. |
| 02/20/2020 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 6, 2020 to April 6, 2020, submitted to The Clerk. |
| 02/24/2020 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including April 6, 2020. |
| 04/06/2020 | Brief of respondent Philip Martin in opposition filed. |
| 04/21/2020 | Reply of petitioner State of Arizona filed. (Distributed) |
| 04/22/2020 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/15/2020. |
| 05/18/2020 | Petition DENIED. |