Apple Inc. v. Qualcomm Incorporated
Petition for certiorari denied on October 3, 2022
Issue: Whether a licensee has Article III standing to challenge the validity of a patent covered by a license agreement that covers multiple patents.
| Date | Proceedings and Orders |
|---|---|
| 01/27/2022 | Application (21A377) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from February 8, 2022 to April 8, 2022, submitted to The Chief Justice. |
| 02/01/2022 | Application (21A377) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until April 8, 2022. |
| 04/01/2022 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 5, 2022) |
| 05/02/2022 | Waiver of right of respondent Qualcomm Incorporated to respond filed. |
| 05/03/2022 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/19/2022. |
| 05/10/2022 | Response Requested. (Due June 9, 2022) |
| 05/16/2022 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 9, 2022 to June 30, 2022, submitted to The Clerk. |
| 05/18/2022 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including June 30, 2022. |
| 06/30/2022 | Brief of respondent Qualcomm Incorporated in opposition filed. |
| 07/20/2022 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022. |
| 10/03/2022 | Petition DENIED. |