Skip to content

Anderson v. Intel Corp. Investment Policy Comm.

Pending petition

Docket No. Op. BelowArgument Opinion Vote Author Term
25-498 9th Cir. TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD

Issue: Whether, for claims predicated on fund underperformance, pleading that an Employee Retirement Income Security Act fiduciary failed to use the requisite “care, skill, prudence, or diligence” under the circumstances and thus breached ERISA’s duty of prudence when investing plan assets requires alleging a “meaningful benchmark.”

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
08/01/2025Application (25A146) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from August 20, 2025 to October 19, 2025, submitted to Justice Kagan.
08/07/2025Application (25A146) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until October 19, 2025.
10/20/2025Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 21, 2025)
10/27/2025Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 21, 2025 to December 12, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
10/29/2025Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 12, 2025.
12/09/2025Brief of respondents Intel Corporation Investment Policy Committee, et al. in opposition filed.
12/23/2025DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/9/2026.
12/23/2025Reply of petitioners Winston R. Anderson, et al. filed. (Distributed)
01/12/2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/16/2026.