Air Liquide Industrial U.S. LP v. Garrido
Petition for certiorari denied on October 3, 2016
Issue: (1) Whether the California Court of Appeal erred by holding, in direct conflict with DirectTV v. Imburgia, that the parties' agreement to apply the Federal Arbitration Act ("FAA") to govern their arbitration contract was unenforceable because the FAA's transportation worker exemption applied; and (2) whether the California Court of Appeal erred by holding, in direct conflict with the Second, Eighth, and Eleventh Circuits, that an employee was exempt from the FAA as a "transportation worker" even though he was not employed in the transportation industry.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Petition of the day (Kate Howard, May 25, 2016)
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
05/03/2016 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 6, 2016) |
06/06/2016 | Brief of respondent Mario Garrido in opposition filed. |
06/20/2016 | Reply of petitioner Air Liquide Industrial U.S. LP filed. |
06/22/2016 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 26, 2016. |
10/03/2016 | Petition DENIED. |