Skip to content

Air Liquide Industrial U.S. LP v. Garrido

Petition for certiorari denied on October 3, 2016

Docket No. Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
15-1336 N/A N/A N/A N/A OT 2016

Issue: (1) Whether the California Court of Appeal erred by holding, in direct conflict with DirectTV v. Imburgia, that the parties' agreement to apply the Federal Arbitration Act ("FAA") to govern their arbitration contract was unenforceable because the FAA's transportation worker exemption applied; and (2) whether the California Court of Appeal erred by holding, in direct conflict with the Second, Eighth, and Eleventh Circuits, that an employee was exempt from the FAA as a "transportation worker" even though he was not employed in the transportation industry.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
05/03/2016Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 6, 2016)
06/06/2016Brief of respondent Mario Garrido in opposition filed.
06/20/2016Reply of petitioner Air Liquide Industrial U.S. LP filed.
06/22/2016DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 26, 2016.
10/03/2016Petition DENIED.