California State Teachers” Retirement System v. Alvarez
Certiorari Denied
Petition for certiorari denied on October 1, 2018.
Issue
Whether, if a court determines that a complaint filed by one shareholder does not plead demand futility with the requisite particularity, the due process clause and the Supreme Court"s decisions in Taylor v. Sturgell and Smith v. Bayer Corp. permit binding other shareholders that were not parties to the initial litigation to that decision, thus barring consideration of whether a new complaint filed by those shareholders pleads sufficient allegations to demonstrate that pre-suit demand was futile.
Apr 12, 2018Application (17A1104) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from April 25, 2018 to June 22, 2018, submitted to Justice Alito.
Apr 15, 2018Application (17A1104) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until June 22, 2018.
Jun 21, 2018Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 23, 2018)Jul 6, 2018Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 23, 2018 to August 22, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.Jul 6, 2018Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 22, 2018
Jul 20, 2018Brief amicus curiae of The Council of Institutional Investors filed.Jul 23, 2018Brief amici curiae of Civil Procedure and Constitutional Law Professors filed.Aug 20, 2018Brief of respondents Aida M. Alvarez, et al. in opposition filed.Sep 5, 2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
Sep 5, 2018Reply of petitioners California State Teachers' Retirement System, et al. filed. (Distributed)Oct 1, 2018Petition DENIED.
Recommended Citation: California State Teachers” Retirement System v. Alvarez, SCOTUSblog, https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/california-state-teachers-retirement-system-v-alvarez/