Editor's Note :

close editor's note Editor's Note :

We're currently hosting a symposium on Tuesday's decision in Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue. Click to follow along.
We also hosted a symposium on Monday's decision in June Medical Services v. Russo. Click to read the submissions.

Briefly Mentioned :

Briefly Noted :

On Thursday, the court released orders from the July 1 conference. The justices granted five cases for a total of four hours of oral argument next term.
On Monday, we expect the court to release opinions at 10 a.m. We will be live-blogging starting at 9:20 a.m. at this link, where you can sign up for an email reminder when the live blog begins.

Taylor v. Sturgell

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
07-371 D.C. Cir. Apr 16, 2008
Tr.Aud.
Jun 12, 2008 9-0 Ginsburg OT 2007

Holding: (1) The theory of preclusion by "virtual representation" is disapproved; the preclusive effects of a judgment in a federal-question case decided by a federal court should instead be determined according to the established grounds for nonparty preclusion; and (2) the case is remanded to allow the courts below the opportunity to determine whether the fifth ground for nonparty preclusion — preclusion because a nonparty to earlier litigation has brought suit as an agent of a party bound by the prior adjudication — applies to Brent Taylor's suit. But courts should be cautious about finding preclusion on the basis of agency.

Judgment: Vacated and remanded, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on June 12, 2008.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

Briefs and Documents

Merits briefs

Amicus briefs

Certiorari filings

 
Share:
Term Snapshot
At a Glance
Awards