Bethune-Hill v. Virginia State Board of Elections
Holding
(1) The district court employed an incorrect legal standard in determining that race did not predominate in 11 of 12 new state legislative districts drawn by the Virginia State Legislature after the 2010 census; and (2) the district court's judgment regarding District 75 -- that the legislature had good reason to believe that a 55 percent target for black voting-age population was necessary to avoid diminishing the ability of black voters to elect their preferred candidates, which at the time would have violated Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 -- is consistent with the basic narrow tailoring analysis explained in Alabama Legislative Black Caucus v. Alabama.
Judgment
Affirmed in part, vacated in part, and remanded, 7-1, in an opinion by Anthony McLeod Kennedy on Mar 1, 2017. Justice Alito filed an opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment. Justice Thomas filed an opinion concurring in the judgment in part and dissenting in part.
Recommended Citation: Bethune-Hill v. Virginia State Board of Elections, SCOTUSblog, https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/bethune-hill-v-virginia-state-board-of-elections/