AT&T Corp. v. Hulteen
Judgment
Reversed, 7-2, in an opinion by David H. Souter on May 18, 2009.
Merit briefs
- Brief for Petitioner AT&T Corporation
- Brief for Respondents Noreen Hulteen, et al.
- Reply Brief for Petitioner AT&T Corporation
Amicus briefs
- Brief for the Erisa Industry Committee in Support of Petitioner
- Brief for the United States of America in Support of Petitioner
- Brief for the Equal Employment Advisory Council in Support of Petitioner
- Brief for Caitlin Borgmann, Deborah Brake, Martha Davis, Joanna Grossman, Sylvia Law, Wendy Parmet, Susan Deller Ross, Michelle Travis, Joan Williams, Wendy Williams, and Deborah Widis in Support of Respondent
- Brief for the National Women’s Law Center in Support of Respondent
- Brief for AARP in Support of Respondents Urging Affirmance
- Brief for the National Employment Lawyers Association, Public Justice, P.C., and Pick Up the Pace in Support of Respondent
Certiorari-Stage Documents
- Opinion below (9th Circuit)
- Petition for certiorari
- Brief in opposition
- Petitioner’s reply
- Brief of the United States Recommending Grant
Recommended Citation: AT&T Corp. v. Hulteen, SCOTUSblog, https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/att-corp-v-hulteen/