Arctic Cat Inc. v. Bombardier Recreational Products Inc.
Petition for certiorari dismissed pursuant to Rule 46 on November 10, 2020
Issue
Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit erred in holding that "notified of the infringement" and "such notice" under 35 U.S.C. § 287(a) refer only to communications from the patent owner.
Sep 14, 2020Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 19, 2020)Sep 17, 2020Waiver of right of respondents Bombardier Recreational Products Inc., et al. to respond filed.
Sep 23, 2020DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/9/2020.
Sep 28, 2020Response Requested. (Due October 28, 2020)
Sep 28, 2020Brief amicus curiae of Lambeth Magnetic Structures, LLC filed.Oct 6, 2020Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 28, 2020 to December 7, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.Oct 7, 2020Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 7, 2020.
Nov 5, 2020Motion to dismiss in accordance with Rule 46.1 filed.Nov 10, 2020Petition Dismissed - Rule 46.
Recommended Citation: Arctic Cat Inc. v. Bombardier Recreational Products Inc., SCOTUSblog, https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/arctic-cat-inc-v-bombardier-recreational-products-inc/