|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|14-10154||1st Cir.||Feb 29, 2016||Jun 27, 2016||6-2||Kagan||OT 2015|
Holding: A reckless domestic assault qualifies as a "misdemeanor crime of domestic violence" that prohibits firearms possession by convicted felons under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(9).
Judgment: Affirmed, 6-2, in an opinion by Justice Kagan on June 27, 2016. Justice Thomas filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justice Sotomayor joined as to Parts I and II.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Jun 4 2015||Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 9, 2015)|
|Jul 1 2015||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including August 10, 2015.|
|Aug 3 2015||Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including September 9, 2015.|
|Sep 9 2015||Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.|
|Sep 14 2015||Reply of petitioners Stephen L. Voisine and William E. Armstrong, III filed.|
|Sep 24 2015||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of October 9, 2015.|
|Oct 13 2015||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of October 16, 2015.|
|Oct 26 2015||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of October 30, 2015.|
|Oct 30 2015||Motion to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED limited to Question 1 presented by the petition.|
|Nov 18 2015||Motion to appoint counsel filed by petitioners Stephen L. Voisine and William E. Armstrong, III.|
|Dec 2 2015||Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 8, 2016.|
|Dec 11 2015||The time to file the joint appendix and petitioners' brief on the merits is extended to and including December 17, 2015.|
|Dec 17 2015||Brief of petitioners Stephen L. Voisine and William E. Armstrong, III filed.|
|Dec 17 2015||Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed.)|
|Dec 21 2015||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs in support of either party received from counsel for petitioners Voisine and Armstrong.|
|Dec 23 2015||SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Monday, February 29, 2016|
|Dec 23 2015||Brief amici curiae of Gun Owners Foundation, et al. filed.|
|Jan 4 2016||Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 1st Circuit.|
|Jan 11 2016||Motion to appoint counsel filed by petitioners GRANTED, and Virginia G. Villa, Esq., of St. Croix Falls, Wisconsin, is appointed to serve as counsel for the petitioners in this case.|
|Jan 12 2016||Record received from the U.S D.C District of Main The record is electronic and located on PACER, with the exception of SEALED records contained in 1 envelope.|
|Jan 15 2016||CIRCULATED.|
|Jan 19 2016||Brief of respondent United States filed. (Distributed)|
|Jan 25 2016||Brief amici curiae of National Indigenous Women's Resource Center, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Jan 25 2016||Brief amici curiae of Major Cities Chiefs and the International Brotherhood of Police Officers filed.|
|Jan 26 2016||Brief amici curiae of National Domestic Violence Hotline, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Jan 26 2016||Brief amicus curiae of Everytown for Gun Safety filed. (Distributed)|
|Jan 26 2016||Brief amici curiae of Child Justice, Inc., et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Jan 26 2016||Brief amici curiae of Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Jan 26 2016||Brief amici curiae of Domestic Violence Legal Empowerment and Appeals Project, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Feb 18 2016||Reply of petitioners Stephen L. Voisine and William E. Armstrong, III filed. (Distributed)|
|Feb 29 2016||Argued. For petitioners: Virginia G. Villa, St. Croix Falls, Wis. (Appointed by this Court.) For respondent: Ilana H. Eisenstein, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C.|
|Jun 27 2016||Adjudged to be AFFIRMED. Kagan, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, and Alito, JJ., joined. Thomas, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Sotomayor, J., joined as to Parts I and II.|
|Jul 26 2016||Records from U.S.D.C. Dist. of Maine has been returned.|
|Jul 29 2016||JUDGMENT ISSUED|
Tomorrow morning the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in a pair of voting rights cases involving Section 2 of the 1965 Voting Rights Act, which prohibits policies or laws that result in racial discrimination in voting.
Missed the morning orders? @AHoweBlogger's got you covered. Read about the new grants including a review of Puerto Rico’s eligibility for a federal benefits program. Plus, she's got an overview of several high-profile petitions still under consideration.
Court will review Puerto Rico’s eligibility for federal benefits program - SCOTUSblog
The court on Monday morning issued orders from the justices’ private conference on Friday, Feb. 26. The justic...
NEW: SCOTUS agrees to take up two new cases. Here's the orders list. https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/030121zor_m6hn.pdf
#SCOTUS grants US v. Vaello-Madero, a challenge to exclusion of Puerto Rico residents from eligibility for Supplemental Social Security Income program, which provides benefits to poor disabled adults & children
Good morning. It’s Monday, and it’s March!
At 9:30 a.m. EST, SCOTUS will release orders from Friday’s conference.
At 10:00, the court will consider an appointments clause challenge to administrative patent judges. More from George Quillin & Jeanne Gills.
Justices to consider appointments clause challenge to administrative patent judges - SCOTUSblog
The justices continue their light load for the February argument session next week. First up is Monday’s Unite...
BREAKING: SCOTUS orders California’s Santa Clara County to allow churches to hold indoor services. Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan dissent. Here’s the short shadow docket order.
#SCOTUS grants emergency request from northern California churches to allow indoor worship services pending appeal, says result is "clearly dictated" by recent decision. Kagan dissents, joined by Breyer & Sotomayor: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/022621zr_1bo2.pdf
Just in: SCOTUS opinions expected next Thursday.
#SCOTUS website indicates that the Court will release orders from today's conference on Monday morning, March 1, at 9:30 am, with opinions again on Thursday, March 4, at 10 am. Justices will also hear oral arguments next week, including in Arizona voting dispute on Tuesday.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.