|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|14-10154||1st Cir.||Feb 29, 2016||Jun 27, 2016||6-2||Kagan||OT 2015|
Holding: A reckless domestic assault qualifies as a "misdemeanor crime of domestic violence" that prohibits firearms possession by convicted felons under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(9).
Judgment: Affirmed, 6-2, in an opinion by Justice Kagan on June 27, 2016. Justice Thomas filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justice Sotomayor joined as to Parts I and II.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Jun 4 2015||Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 9, 2015)|
|Jul 1 2015||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including August 10, 2015.|
|Aug 3 2015||Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including September 9, 2015.|
|Sep 9 2015||Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.|
|Sep 14 2015||Reply of petitioners Stephen L. Voisine and William E. Armstrong, III filed.|
|Sep 24 2015||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of October 9, 2015.|
|Oct 13 2015||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of October 16, 2015.|
|Oct 26 2015||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of October 30, 2015.|
|Oct 30 2015||Motion to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED limited to Question 1 presented by the petition.|
|Nov 18 2015||Motion to appoint counsel filed by petitioners Stephen L. Voisine and William E. Armstrong, III.|
|Dec 2 2015||Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 8, 2016.|
|Dec 11 2015||The time to file the joint appendix and petitioners' brief on the merits is extended to and including December 17, 2015.|
|Dec 17 2015||Brief of petitioners Stephen L. Voisine and William E. Armstrong, III filed.|
|Dec 17 2015||Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed.)|
|Dec 21 2015||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs in support of either party received from counsel for petitioners Voisine and Armstrong.|
|Dec 23 2015||SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Monday, February 29, 2016|
|Dec 23 2015||Brief amici curiae of Gun Owners Foundation, et al. filed.|
|Jan 4 2016||Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 1st Circuit.|
|Jan 11 2016||Motion to appoint counsel filed by petitioners GRANTED, and Virginia G. Villa, Esq., of St. Croix Falls, Wisconsin, is appointed to serve as counsel for the petitioners in this case.|
|Jan 12 2016||Record received from the U.S D.C District of Main The record is electronic and located on PACER, with the exception of SEALED records contained in 1 envelope.|
|Jan 15 2016||CIRCULATED.|
|Jan 19 2016||Brief of respondent United States filed. (Distributed)|
|Jan 25 2016||Brief amici curiae of National Indigenous Women's Resource Center, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Jan 25 2016||Brief amici curiae of Major Cities Chiefs and the International Brotherhood of Police Officers filed.|
|Jan 26 2016||Brief amici curiae of National Domestic Violence Hotline, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Jan 26 2016||Brief amicus curiae of Everytown for Gun Safety filed. (Distributed)|
|Jan 26 2016||Brief amici curiae of Child Justice, Inc., et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Jan 26 2016||Brief amici curiae of Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Jan 26 2016||Brief amici curiae of Domestic Violence Legal Empowerment and Appeals Project, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Feb 18 2016||Reply of petitioners Stephen L. Voisine and William E. Armstrong, III filed. (Distributed)|
|Feb 29 2016||Argued. For petitioners: Virginia G. Villa, St. Croix Falls, Wis. (Appointed by this Court.) For respondent: Ilana H. Eisenstein, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C.|
|Jun 27 2016||Adjudged to be AFFIRMED. Kagan, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, and Alito, JJ., joined. Thomas, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Sotomayor, J., joined as to Parts I and II.|
|Jul 26 2016||Records from U.S.D.C. Dist. of Maine has been returned.|
|Jul 29 2016||JUDGMENT ISSUED|
Today at SCOTUS: One oral argument on the statute of limitations in the Quiet Title Act. Is it "jurisdictional"? Or just a "claim-processing rule"? That might sound arcane, but cases like these affect the ability of citizens to sue the federal government.
A squabble over a forest road may pave the way for further narrowing of “jurisdictional” timing rules - SCOTUSblog
Wednesday’s argument in Wilkins v. United States is next in a protracted line of cases in which the court ...
Bribery or lobbying?
Percoco v. United States in a TikTok minute.
JUST IN: For the second time in the past week, SCOTUS denies an emergency request to block the execution of Kevin Johnson. The execution is scheduled for tonight in Missouri. Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson dissent from the brief order allowing the execution to proceed.
Today at SCOTUS: Can the federal government prioritize certain groups of unauthorized immigrants for deportation over others? And do states have standing to sue the government if they disagree with those priorities? @AHoweBlogger previews U.S. v. Texas:
In U.S. v. Texas, broad questions over immigration enforcement and states’ ability to challenge federal policies - SCOTUSblog
The Supreme Court will hear oral argument on Tuesday in a dispute over the Biden administration’s authority to...
Today at SCOTUS: The justices return to the bench for oral arguments in a pair of public-corruption cases, both stemming from scandals in New York politics that arose during Andrew Cuomo's time as governor. In both cases, the defendants are claiming prosecutorial overreach.