Voisine v. United States

Docket No.	Op. Below	Argument	Opinion	Vote	Author	Term
14-10154	1st Cir.	Feb 29, 2016 Tr.Aud.	Jun 27, 2016	6-2	Kagan	OT 2015

Holding: A reckless domestic assault qualifies as a "misdemeanor crime of domestic violence" that prohibits firearms possession by convicted felons under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(9).

Judgment: Affirmed, 6-2, in an opinion by Justice Kagan on June 27, 2016. Justice Thomas filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justice Sotomayor joined as to Parts I and II.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

Opinion analysis: Federal “use of force” encompasses reckless domestic violence misdemeanor offenses (Rory Little)
A “view” from the Courtroom: A final bite at the apple (Mark Walsh)
Argument analysis: An unremarkable gun case may be harbinger of things to come (Rory Little)
Argument preview: Another arcane case in which Justice Scalia will be missed (Rory Little)
Court grants review in firearm-possession case (Amy Howe)

Date	Proceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
Jun 4 2015	Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 9, 2015)
Jul 1 2015	Order extending time to file response to petition to and including August 10, 2015.
Aug 3 2015	Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including September 9, 2015.
Sep 9 2015	Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
Sep 14 2015	Reply of petitioners Stephen L. Voisine and William E. Armstrong, III filed.
Sep 24 2015	DISTRIBUTED for Conference of October 9, 2015.
Oct 13 2015	DISTRIBUTED for Conference of October 16, 2015.
Oct 26 2015	DISTRIBUTED for Conference of October 30, 2015.
Oct 30 2015	Motion to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED limited to Question 1 presented by the petition.
Nov 18 2015	Motion to appoint counsel filed by petitioners Stephen L. Voisine and William E. Armstrong, III.
Dec 2 2015	Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 8, 2016.
Dec 11 2015	The time to file the joint appendix and petitioners' brief on the merits is extended to and including December 17, 2015.
Dec 17 2015	Brief of petitioners Stephen L. Voisine and William E. Armstrong, III filed.
Dec 17 2015	Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed.)
Dec 21 2015	Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs in support of either party received from counsel for petitioners Voisine and Armstrong.
Dec 23 2015	SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Monday, February 29, 2016
Dec 23 2015	Brief amici curiae of Gun Owners Foundation, et al. filed.
Jan 4 2016	Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 1st Circuit.
Jan 11 2016	Motion to appoint counsel filed by petitioners GRANTED, and Virginia G. Villa, Esq., of St. Croix Falls, Wisconsin, is appointed to serve as counsel for the petitioners in this case.
Jan 12 2016	Record received from the U.S D.C District of Main The record is electronic and located on PACER, with the exception of SEALED records contained in 1 envelope.
Jan 15 2016	CIRCULATED.
Jan 19 2016	Brief of respondent United States filed. (Distributed)
Jan 25 2016	Brief amici curiae of National Indigenous Women's Resource Center, et al. filed. (Distributed)
Jan 25 2016	Brief amici curiae of Major Cities Chiefs and the International Brotherhood of Police Officers filed.
Jan 26 2016	Brief amici curiae of National Domestic Violence Hotline, et al. filed. (Distributed)
Jan 26 2016	Brief amicus curiae of Everytown for Gun Safety filed. (Distributed)
Jan 26 2016	Brief amici curiae of Child Justice, Inc., et al. filed. (Distributed)
Jan 26 2016	Brief amici curiae of Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence, et al. filed. (Distributed)
Jan 26 2016	Brief amici curiae of Domestic Violence Legal Empowerment and Appeals Project, et al. filed. (Distributed)
Feb 18 2016	Reply of petitioners Stephen L. Voisine and William E. Armstrong, III filed. (Distributed)
Feb 29 2016	Argued. For petitioners: Virginia G. Villa, St. Croix Falls, Wis. (Appointed by this Court.) For respondent: Ilana H. Eisenstein, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C.
Jun 27 2016	Adjudged to be AFFIRMED. Kagan, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, and Alito, JJ., joined. Thomas, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Sotomayor, J., joined as to Parts I and II.
Jul 26 2016	Records from U.S.D.C. Dist. of Maine has been returned.
Jul 29 2016	JUDGMENT ISSUED

Featured Posts

Battle over border wall comes to the court – Amy Howe

Trump administration ends effort to include citizenship question on 2020 census – Amy Howe

Tom Goldstein and Sarah Harrington review past Supreme Court term with Casetext’s Laura Safdie – SCOTUStalk
Sponsored by Casetext
SCOTUStalk see all
Email Digest Sign-Up
Receive a daily email digest from Feedburner by entering your email.
Merits Case Pages and Archives

Archives

or

This Week at the Court
The justices are on their summer recess.
Major Cases
- Department of Commerce v. New York
  The secretary of the Department of Commerce did not violate the enumeration clause or the Census Act in deciding to reinstate a citizenship question on the 2020 census questionnaire, but the district court was warranted in remanding the case back to the agency where the evidence tells a story that does not match the secretary’s explanation for his decision.
- Kisor v. Wilkie
  Auer v. Robbins and Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co – under which deference is given to an agency’s reasonable reading of its own genuinely ambiguous regulations – are not overruled.
- Rucho v. Common Cause
  Partisan gerrymandering claims present political questions beyond the reach of the federal courts.
- The American Legion v. American Humanist Association
  The Bladensburg Cross does not violate the establishment clause of the First Amendment.
- Gamble v. United States
  The dual-sovereignty doctrine – under which two offenses are not the “same offence” for double jeopardy purposes if prosecuted by separate sovereigns – is upheld.
see all this term’s cases »
Recent Decisions
- Lamone v. Benisek Partisan gerrymandering claims present political questions beyond the reach of the federal courts.
- Department of Commerce v. New York The secretary of the Department of Commerce did not violate the enumeration clause or the Census Act in deciding to reinstate a citizenship question on the 2020 census questionnaire, but the district court was warranted in remanding the case back to the agency where the evidence tells a story that does not match the secretary’s explanation for his decision.
- Mitchell v. Wisconsin The Wisconsin Supreme Court’s judgment – affirming the drunk-driving convictions of Gerald Mitchell, who was administered a warrantless blood test while he was unconscious – is vacated, and the case is remanded.
- Rucho v. Common Cause Partisan gerrymandering claims present political questions beyond the reach of the federal courts.
- Kisor v. Wilkie Auer v. Robbins and Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co – under which deference is given to an agency’s reasonable reading of its own genuinely ambiguous regulations – are not overruled.
- Tennessee Wine & Spirits Retailers Association v. Thomas Tennessee’s 2-year durational-residency requirement applicable to retail liquor store license applicants violates the commerce clause and is not saved by the 21st Amendment.
- United States v. Haymond The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit’s judgment – that 18 U. S. C. §3583(k)’s last two sentences are unconstitutional and unenforceable – is vacated, and the case is remanded.
- Food Marketing Institute v. Argus Leader Media Where commercial or financial information is both customarily and actually treated as private by its owner and provided to the government under an assurance of privacy, the information is “confidential” within the meaning of 5 U. S. C. §552(b)(4), the Freedom of Information Act’s Exemption 4.
- Iancu v. Brunetti The Lanham Act prohibition on the registration of “immoral” or “scandalous” trademarks infringes the First Amendment.
- The Dutra Group v. Batterton A plaintiff may not recover punitive damages on a maritime claim of unseaworthiness.
- United States v. Davis Title 18 U. S. C. §924(c)(3)(B), which provides enhanced penalties for using a firearm during a “crime of violence,” is unconstitutionally vague.
see all this term’s cases »
Current Relists
Recent Special Features
Statistical Snapshot

Cases argued 70

Cases decided 67

Summary reversals 5

Merits cases granted to date 74

see all »
Live Blog Archives
See all
Twitter Feed

Tweets by @SCOTUSblog

Majority Opinions by Author
Voting Breakdown Argued Cases

Calendar: July 2019
Full Calendar Submit Event

July 2019

Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa

1

2

3

4
Holiday

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31
- Orders/Opinions
- Arguments
- Conferences
- Events
- Holidays
- Multiple

Su	Mo	Tu	We	Th	Fr	Sa
	1	2	3	4 Holiday	5	6
7	8	9	10	11	12	13
14	15	16	17	18	19	20
21	22	23	24	25	26	27
28	29	30	31

Download our App in the Apple Store
Videos see all

Justice Thomas at the Supreme Court Historical Society

On June 3, Justice Clarence Thomas spoke with David Rubenstein for the Supreme Court Historical Society’s annual lecture at the Supreme Court.

Peabody Award
Awarded the Peabody Award for excellence in electronic media.
Sigma Delta Chi
Awarded the Sigma Delta Chi deadline reporting award for online coverage of the Affordable Care Act decision.
National Press Club Award
Awarded the National Press Club's Breaking News Award for coverage of the Affordable Care Act decision.
Silver Gavel Award
Awarded the Silver Gavel Award by the American Bar Association for fostering the American public’s understanding of the law and the legal system.
American Gavel Award
Awarded the American Gavel Award for Distinguished Reporting About the Judiciary to recognize the highest standards of reporting about courts and the justice system.
Webby Award
Awarded the Webby Award for excellence on the internet.

Cases argued	70
Cases decided	67
Summary reversals	5
Merits cases granted to date	74

Voisine v. United States

SCOTUSblog Coverage

Featured Posts

Battle over border wall comes to the court – Amy Howe

Trump administration ends effort to include citizenship question on 2020 census – Amy Howe

Tom Goldstein and Sarah Harrington review past Supreme Court term with Casetext’s Laura Safdie – SCOTUStalk

Sponsored by Casetext

SCOTUStalk see all

Email Digest Sign-Up

Merits Case Pages and Archives

This Week at the Court

Major Cases

Recent Decisions

Current Relists

Recent Special Features

Statistical Snapshot

Live Blog Archives

Twitter Feed

Majority Opinions by Author

Voting Breakdown Argued Cases

Calendar: July 2019

July 2019

Holiday

Download our App in the Apple Store

Videos see all

Peabody Award

Sigma Delta Chi

National Press Club Award

Silver Gavel Award

American Gavel Award

Webby Award