|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|17-1672||10th Cir.||Feb 26, 2019||Jun 26, 2019||5-4||Gorsuch||OT 2018|
Holding: The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit’s judgment – that 18 U. S. C. §3583(k)’s last two sentences are unconstitutional and unenforceable – is vacated, and the case is remanded.
Judgment: Vacated and remanded, 5-4, in an opinion by Justice Gorsuch on June 26, 2019. Justice Gorsuch announced the judgment of the Supreme Court and delivered an opinion, in which Justices Ginsburg, Sotomayor, and Kagan joined. Justice Breyer filed an opinion concurring in the judgment. Justice Alito filed a dissenting opinion, in which Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Thomas and Kavanaugh joined.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Apr 03 2018||Application (17A1065) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from April 16, 2018 to May 16, 2018, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.|
|Apr 04 2018||Application (17A1065) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until May 16, 2018.|
|May 03 2018||Application (17A1065) to extend further the time from May 16, 2018 to June 15, 2018, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.|
|May 03 2018||Application (17A1065) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until June 15, 2018.|
|Jun 15 2018||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 16, 2018)|
|Jun 28 2018||Motion of Andre Ralph Haymond for an extension of time not accepted for filing (corrected version submitted). (June 29, 2018)|
|Jun 28 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 16, 2018 to August 15, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Jun 29 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 15, 2018.|
|Aug 07 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 15, 2018 to September 14, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Aug 13 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including September 14, 2018.|
|Sep 13 2018||Brief of respondent Andre Ralph Haymond in opposition filed.|
|Sep 13 2018||Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Andre Ralph Haymond.|
|Sep 26 2018||Waiver of the 14-day waiting period pursuant to Rule 15.5 filed by the Solicitor General.|
|Sep 26 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/12/2018.|
|Sep 26 2018||Reply of petitioner United States filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 22 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/26/2018.|
|Oct 26 2018||Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED.|
|Oct 26 2018||Petition GRANTED.|
|Nov 19 2018||Motion for an extension of time to file the briefs on the merits filed.|
|Nov 20 2018||Motion to extend the time to file the briefs on the merits is granted. The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including December 17, 2018. The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including January 18, 2019.|
|Dec 06 2018||Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner United States.|
|Dec 17 2018||Brief of petitioner United States filed.|
|Dec 21 2018||SET FOR ARGUMENT for Tuesday, February 26, 2019.|
|Dec 21 2018||Brief amici curiae of States of Utah, et al. filed.|
|Jan 07 2019||Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner GRANTED.|
|Jan 11 2019||Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 10th Circuit.|
|Jan 15 2019||CIRCULATED|
|Jan 16 2019||Record from the U.S.C.A. 10th Circuit is electronic and located on PACER. The record is complete.|
|Jan 18 2019||Brief of respondent Andre Ralph Haymond filed. (Distributed)|
|Jan 25 2019||Blanket Consent filed by Respondent, Andre Ralph Haymond.|
|Jan 25 2019||Brief amici curiae of FAMM and the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers filed. (Distributed)|
|Jan 25 2019||Brief amicus curiae of Due Process Institute filed. (Distributed)|
|Jan 25 2019||Brief amici curiae of Social Science and Law Scholars filed. (Distributed)|
|Feb 01 2019||Letter Proposing Material for Lodging of Andre Ralph Haymond not accepted for filing. (Request withdrawn as record material received from Tenth Circuit. February 19, 2019)|
|Feb 14 2019||Reply of petitioner United States filed. (Distributed)|
|Feb 26 2019||Argued. For petitioner: Eric J. Feigin, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For respondent: William D. Lunn, Tulsa, Okla.|
|Apr 19 2019||Motion for appointment of counsel filed by respondent Andre Ralph Haymond.|
|Apr 19 2019||Affidavit of service to motion for appointment of counsel filed. (May 29, 2019)|
|May 28 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/13/2019.|
|Jun 17 2019||Motion to appoint counsel filed by respondent GRANTED, and William D. Lunn, Esq., of Tulsa, Oklahoma, is appointed to serve as counsel for respondent in this case.|
|Jun 26 2019||Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED. Gorsuch, J., announced the judgment of the Court and delivered an opinion, in which Ginsburg, Sotomayor, and Kagan, JJ., joined. Breyer, J., filed an opinion concurring in the judgment. Alito, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Roberts, C. J., and Thomas and Kavanaugh, JJ., joined.|
|Jul 29 2019||JUDGMENT ISSUED>|
In 2019, the Supreme Court limited the scope of a federal law that bans people convicted of felonies from having a gun. Up this morning at the court: back-to-back cases that will decide how many felon-in-possession convictions will need new trials or pleas under that 2019 ruling.
NEW: SCOTUS adds one new case to its docket for next term: Hemphill v. New York, a criminal-procedure case about the interaction between hearsay rules and the right of defendants to confront witnesses against them. Still no action on major petitions involving guns and abortion.
The court will release orders at 9:30 a.m. EDT followed by oral argument in two cases.
First, whether Alaska Native regional and village corporations are “Indian Tribes” for purposes of CARES Act Covid-related relief.
By @StanfordLaw’s Gregory Ablavsky.
Are Alaska Native corporations Indian tribes? A multimillion-dollar question - SCOTUSblog
Are Alaska Native corporations — special corporations that Congress created in 1971 when it resolved Native claims ...
It's official: In the first-ever SCOTUS bracketology tournament, our readers have chosen CHIEF JUSTICE EARL WARREN as the greatest justice in history. The author of Brown v. Board, Loving v. Virginia, and Miranda v. Arizona defeated top-seeded John Marshall in the final round.
We've reached the final round of SCOTUS bracketology, and two illustrious chief justices are facing off for the championship. One wrote Marbury v. Madison. The other wrote Brown v. Board. Our full write-up on both finalists is here: https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/04/the-great-chief-and-the-super-chief-a-final-showdown-in-supreme-court-march-madness/
Cast your vote below!
NEW: The Supreme Court will issue opinion(s?) next Thursday April 22. We’re still waiting on decisions in the ACA case and Fulton v. City of Philadelphia about religious liberty and LGBT rights.
Four Democrats unveiled legislation today to expand the size of the Supreme Court from nine justices to 13 -- but Democratic leaders in both the House and Senate quickly threw cold water on the proposal.
Here's our report from @jamesromoser:
Bill to enlarge the Supreme Court faces dim prospects in Congress - SCOTUSblog
Four congressional Democrats introduced legislation Thursday to expand the number of seats on the Supreme Court from ...
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.